Side by side
| Typefully | Everpost | |
|---|---|---|
| Networks | X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon | LinkedIn only |
| Built around | X, with LinkedIn added | LinkedIn, from the first screen |
| X analytics | Yes, on Creator and above | No, it cannot post to X either |
| LinkedIn analytics | Not yet, stated in their help centre | Yes, one snapshot per reading |
| Threads, auto numbering, scheduled retweets | Yes, and they are good | No |
| Public API and agent integrations | Yes, API, MCP, Zapier, Notion, Slack, Raycast | No public API |
| Free plan | Yes, 1 social set, 1 user, 10 posts a month | Yes, no card and no account |
| LinkedIn first comment | Yes | Yes |
| LinkedIn carousels | Yes, PDF | Yes, three styles, PDF export |
| Preview marking the see more cut | Editor preview, without the fold marked | Yes, and it counts the 210 characters live |
| Where the history sits | Typefully's servers | One SQLite file on your disk |
| Pipeline CRM and network graph | No | Yes, both |
| Teams and shared drafts | Yes, on Business | No, one person, one machine |
The gap, in Typefully's own words
Our analytics only support X accounts, and do not include community posts.
We're working on analytics for LinkedIn as well. You can upvote this feature.Typefully help centre, article on analytics, read 16 August 2026.
Its pricing page says the same thing in the layout rather than in a sentence. There are two blocks in the plan comparison table and this is what is in each.
Block headed "X Analytics"
Block headed "LinkedIn", same table
This is worth a section rather than a footnote because Typefully's standalone analytics page reads differently. It offers to analyse growth in followers, impressions, engagement, profile clicks and conversion rate, and lists five platforms further down the same page.
Check this before you buyTypefully has said it is building LinkedIn analytics, so this is a snapshot rather than a permanent state. Open the help centre article and the pricing table yourself. It is exactly the kind of thing that changes without a comparison page noticing.
What gets measured here instead





The mirror image weakness
Everpost cannot post to X, Bluesky, Threads or Mastodon at all, and has no public API. If your writing splits evenly across networks, neither tool is a complete answer on its own.
Why no Typefully prices are quotedThe plans are Free, Creator billed annually only, Business priced per social set, and Enterprise on request. The figures render in the browser rather than the page source, and third party roundups disagree with each other, so read them off Typefully's own page.
So which one
| Stay with Typefully if | Try Everpost if |
|---|---|
| X is where you mainly write | LinkedIn has quietly become the only one that matters |
| One draft needs to reach five networks | One network needs to be measured properly |
| You want an API, MCP and agent integrations | You want the history in a file rather than an endpoint |
| The editor is the thing you are buying | The record is the thing you are buying |
Running both costs nothing. Typefully's free plan and Everpost's free tier overlap fine, and the tool you write in does not have to be the tool that keeps the record.
Measure the network you actually post to
Free tier, no card, no account. macOS and Windows, currently in private beta.
Request early access See pricing