Everpost/Alternatives/Typefully

Typefully alternative, once LinkedIn stops being the cross post.

Typefully publishes to five networks and measures one. Its own help centre says analytics support X accounts only, and that LinkedIn analytics are not built yet.

5networks Typefully publishes to: X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads and Mastodon.
1network its analytics cover, according to its own help centre: X.
2rows in the LinkedIn block of its pricing table: first comment, and PDF carousels.

Side by side

 TypefullyEverpost
NetworksX, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, MastodonLinkedIn only
Built aroundX, with LinkedIn addedLinkedIn, from the first screen
X analyticsYes, on Creator and aboveNo, it cannot post to X either
LinkedIn analyticsNot yet, stated in their help centreYes, one snapshot per reading
Threads, auto numbering, scheduled retweetsYes, and they are goodNo
Public API and agent integrationsYes, API, MCP, Zapier, Notion, Slack, RaycastNo public API
Free planYes, 1 social set, 1 user, 10 posts a monthYes, no card and no account
LinkedIn first commentYesYes
LinkedIn carouselsYes, PDFYes, three styles, PDF export
Preview marking the see more cutEditor preview, without the fold markedYes, and it counts the 210 characters live
Where the history sitsTypefully's serversOne SQLite file on your disk
Pipeline CRM and network graphNoYes, both
Teams and shared draftsYes, on BusinessNo, one person, one machine

The gap, in Typefully's own words

Our analytics only support X accounts, and do not include community posts. We're working on analytics for LinkedIn as well. You can upvote this feature. Typefully help centre, article on analytics, read 16 August 2026.

Its pricing page says the same thing in the layout rather than in a sentence. There are two blocks in the plan comparison table and this is what is in each.

Block headed "X Analytics"

Detailed metrics
Profile conversion rate
Tweeting streaks
CSV download

Block headed "LinkedIn", same table

First comment
PDF carousels
Nothing elseThe Creator plan's own bullet reads "X analytics", not "analytics".

This is worth a section rather than a footnote because Typefully's standalone analytics page reads differently. It offers to analyse growth in followers, impressions, engagement, profile clicks and conversion rate, and lists five platforms further down the same page.

Check this before you buyTypefully has said it is building LinkedIn analytics, so this is a snapshot rather than a permanent state. Open the help centre article and the pricing table yourself. It is exactly the kind of thing that changes without a comparison page noticing.

What gets measured here instead

Everpost analytics on the profile tab: profile views 492, search appearances 192, followers 3,552 and connections 3,472, plotted across months, with a table of every capture below.
The four profile metric cards, each with the change over the last 35 days.
LinkedIn shows profile views and search appearances as a rolling window and drops the rest. Every capture is written to a new row here, so 492 profile views is a point on a line rather than a number that replaced yesterday's.
The Everpost composer preview and checks panel side by side, showing the draft as the feed renders it.
The draft at LinkedIn's real column width, with the fold marked. Try that part in a browser first.
The reach per post bar chart in Everpost, one bar per day published across the last 90 days.
One bar per day you published. The gaps are days you did not post, not days with no data.
The Everpost library listing published, scheduled and imported posts with tabs for all, ideas, drafts and published.
Ideas, drafts and published posts in one searchable list, imported from LinkedIn's Shares.csv.

The mirror image weakness

Everpost cannot post to X, Bluesky, Threads or Mastodon at all, and has no public API. If your writing splits evenly across networks, neither tool is a complete answer on its own.

Why no Typefully prices are quotedThe plans are Free, Creator billed annually only, Business priced per social set, and Enterprise on request. The figures render in the browser rather than the page source, and third party roundups disagree with each other, so read them off Typefully's own page.

So which one

Stay with Typefully ifTry Everpost if
X is where you mainly writeLinkedIn has quietly become the only one that matters
One draft needs to reach five networksOne network needs to be measured properly
You want an API, MCP and agent integrationsYou want the history in a file rather than an endpoint
The editor is the thing you are buyingThe record is the thing you are buying

Running both costs nothing. Typefully's free plan and Everpost's free tier overlap fine, and the tool you write in does not have to be the tool that keeps the record.

Measure the network you actually post to

Free tier, no card, no account. macOS and Windows, currently in private beta.

Request early access See pricing